Climate Change? What Climate Change?

Climate Models and COVID-19 Models  [This whole escapade with computer modeling of the Coronavirus and how many have been done that have just been wildly wrong should serve as a warning for those that put their total faith in the modeling of their beloved climate change (nee: global warming). Computer modeling can be wrong no matter what the subject unless there are actual measurable results to confirm the accuracy of the model and the assumptions in the model. This is showing that the climate change model, as most of us know, can not be true as it is all based on a computer model and there is no corroborating measurable proof. In fact, the measurable component is wrong in virtually every case. - Ed] Climate Models and COVID-19 Models By Norman Rogers Computer models are seductive even though they are very often completely wrong. The more complicated they are the greater chance that they are wrong. Like children, they copy their parents -- the model ar

Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions Myron Ebell , Steven J. Milloy • September 18, 2019 Thanks go to Tony Heller, who first collected many of these news clips and posted them on RealClimateScience . SUMMARY Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science. More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science. While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media eager for sensational headlines, the failures are typically not revisited. 1967: ‘Dire famine by 1975