(Natural News)
The climate change hoax has collapsed. A
devastating series of research papers has just been published,
revealing that human activity can account for no more than a .01°C
rise in global temperatures, meaning that all the human activity
targeted by radical climate change alarmists — combustion engines,
airplane flights, diesel tractors — has virtually no measurable impact
on the temperature of the planet.
Finnish scientists spearheaded the research, releasing a paper entitled, “No Experimental Evidence for the Significant Anthropogenic Climate Change.”
The paper explains that IPCC analysis of global temperatures suffers
from a glaring error — namely, failure to account for “influences of low
cloud cover” and how it impacts global temperatures. Natural variations
in low cloud cover, which are strongly influenced by cosmic radiation’s
ability to penetrate Earth’s atmosphere due to variations in the
strength of our planet’s magnetosphere, account for nearly all changes
in global temperature, the researchers explain.
As this chart reveals, more cloud cover is inversely related to temperature. In other words, clouds shield the surface of the Earth from the sun, providing shade cover cooling, while a lack of clouds results in more warming:
Cloud cover accounts for the real changes in global temperatures
This is further supported by researchers at Kobe University in Japan
who published a nearly simultaneous paper that reveals how changes in
our planet’s magnetic field govern the intensity of solar radiation that
reaches the lower atmosphere, causing cloud formation that alters
global temperatures.
Get more news like this without being censored: Get the Natural News app
for your mobile devices. Enjoy uncensored news, lab test results,
videos, podcasts and more. Bypass all the unfair censorship by Google,
Facebook, YouTube and Twitter. Get your daily news and videos directly
from the source! Download here.
That study, published in Nature, is called, “Intensified East Asian winter monsoon during the last geomagnetic reversal transition.” It states: Records of suborbital-scale climate variation during the last
glacial and Holocene periods can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of
rapid climate changes… At least one event was associated with a decrease
in the strength of the Earth’s magnetic field. Thus, climate records
from the MIS 19 interglacial can be used to elucidate the mechanisms of a
variety of climate changes, including testing the effect of changes in
geomagnetic dipole field strength on climate through galactic cosmic ray
(GCR)-induced cloud formation…
In effect, cosmic rays which are normally deflected via the
magnetosphere are, in times of weak or changing magnetic fields
emanating from Earth itself, able to penetrate further into Earth’s
atmosphere, causing the formation of low-level clouds which cover the
land in a kind of “umbrella effect” that shades the land from the sun,
allowing cooling to take place. But a lack of clouds makes the surface
hotter, as would be expected. This natural phenomenon is now documented
to be the primary driver of global temperatures and climate, not human activity.
Burn all the oil you want, in other words, and it’s still just a drop
in the bucket compared to the power of the sun and other cosmic
influences. All the fossil fuel consumption in the world barely
contributes anything to actual global temperatures, the researchers
confirmed.
As they explain, the IPCC’s climate models are wildly overestimating the influence of carbon dioxide on global temperatures: …the [IPCC] models fail to derive the influences of low cloud
cover fraction on the global temperature. A too small natural component
results in a too large portion for the contribution of the greenhouse
gases like carbon dioxide. That is why J. KAUPPINEN AND P. MALMI IPCC
represents the climate sensitivity more than one order of magnitude
larger than our sensitivity 0.24°C. Because the anthropogenic portion in
the increased CO2 is less than 10%, we have practically no
anthropogenic climate change. The low clouds control mainly the global
temperature.
The entire “climate change” hoax is a fraud
Carbon dioxide, in other
words, isn’t the “pollutant” that climate change alarmists have long
claimed it to be. CO2 won’t destroy the planet and barely has any effect
on global temperatures (the IPCC’s estimate of its effect is, according
to Finnish researchers, about one order of magnitude too large, or ten
times the actual amount).
In fact, NASA was forced to recently admit that carbon dioxide is re-greening the Earth
on a massive scale by supporting the growth of rainforests, trees and
grasslands. See these maps showing the increase in green plant life,
thanks to rising CO2:
Importantly, reducing our global consumption of fossil fuels will have virtually no impact on global temperatures.
The far bigger governor of climate and temperatures is the strength and
configuration of Earth’s magnetosphere, which has always been in flux
since the formation of the planet billions of years ago. The weaker the
magnetosphere, the more cosmic rays penetrate the atmosphere, resulting
in the generation of clouds, which shield the planet’s surface from the
sun. Thus, a weaker magnetosphere causes global cooling, while a
stronger magnetosphere results in global warming, according to this
research. This phenomenon is called the “Svensmark Effect.”
As reported by Science Daily: This suggests that the increase in cosmic rays was accompanied by
an increase in low-cloud cover, the umbrella effect of the clouds
cooled the continent, and Siberian high atmospheric pressure became
stronger. Added to other phenomena during the geomagnetic reversal —
evidence of an annual average temperature drop of 2-3 degrees Celsius,
and an increase in annual temperature ranges from the sediment in Osaka
Bay — this new discovery about winter monsoons provides further proof
that the climate changes are caused by the cloud umbrella effect.
The “war on carbon” is derived from sheer stupidity, arrogance and scientific illiteracy
The extreme alarmism of climate change lunatics — best personified by Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez’ insistence that humanity will be destroyed in 12 years if we don’t stop burning fossil fuels
— is all based on nothing but fearmongering media propaganda and faked
science. (The IPCC and NOAA both routinely fudge temperature data to try
to create a warming “trend” where none exists.)
It’s all a massive, coordinated fraud, and the mainstream media
deliberately lies to the public about climate change to push anti-free
market schemes that would destroy the U.S. economy while transferring
literally trillions of dollars into the pockets of wealthy globalists as
part of a “carbon tax” scheme.
Yet carbon isn’t the problem at all. And the “war on carbon” is a stupid, senseless policy created by idiots, given that humans are carbon-based lifeforms, meaning that any “war on carbon” is a war on humanity.
Wrong Again: 50 Years of Failed Eco-pocalyptic Predictions Myron Ebell , Steven J. Milloy • September 18, 2019 Thanks go to Tony Heller, who first collected many of these news clips and posted them on RealClimateScience . SUMMARY Modern doomsayers have been predicting climate and environmental disaster since the 1960s. They continue to do so today. None of the apocalyptic predictions with due dates as of today have come true. What follows is a collection of notably wild predictions from notable people in government and science. More than merely spotlighting the failed predictions, this collection shows that the makers of failed apocalyptic predictions often are individuals holding respected positions in government and science. While such predictions have been and continue to be enthusiastically reported by a media eager for sensational headlines, the failures are typically not revisited. 1967: ‘Dire famine by 1975...
Giant 'Rivers' That Flow Through The Sky Mapped For First Time Environment 26 February 2024 By Tessa Koumoundouros Atmospheric rivers, filaments of intense moisture transport in the atmosphere, can now be automatically detected in satellite observations. (NOAA) Rivers of intense moisture wend their way through our atmosphere just as their liquid counterparts do across the land. Unfortunately the sky streams are much harder for us to see. Often a product of cyclones, atmospheric rivers can dictate where intense rain will fall , making their lack of visibility a problem. Understanding them grows increasingly important as our warming atmosphere soaks up even greater amounts of water, forcing these aerial waterways to change course . Until now, researchers relied on computer modeling to predict where this water vapor likely flows, but researchers have now devised a way for us to spy on them in real time. The missing piece of the puzzle was a 3D windscape....
Comments
Post a Comment